“Of Mice and Men”: George’s actions at the end of the novel Essay

Discuss Georges actions at the end of the novel. How shtup we rationalise what he does to Lennie? How can we condemn it?Although slaughter is morally incorrect, mercy killing can be justified as it whitethorn prevent a later necessary and racking expiry. In the novella Of Mice and manpower written by John Steinbeck, the theatrical role George tears his fighter, Lennie. Whilst Georges actions can be condemned, George had grievous intentions towards the death of his friend. Steinbeck makes it clear through tabu the novella that although horrid incidents may occur such(prenominal) as Lennies death that it was how it was during the non bad(p) Depression. However unity may like to condemn Georges actions in gibe his exclusively friend, George had forgivable intentions as to why he chose to go against Lennie.Georges murdering of his friend was with extinct malicious intent. It is clear from the start in the novella that George cargons for Lennie, as he protects and looks o ut for him. Killing Lennie was not an easy survival of the fittest.. He likewise prevented a further painful and excruciating death for Lennie, as Curley plans to shoot that big bastards gritstone right outta him. This implies that Curley intends no mercy and an torturous death awaits Lennie. By shot his friend, George gives Lennie a peaceful death. During the scene where the two hands are in the bush, George once over again recites their imagine which reminds the reference and Lennie of their friendship. He tells George, I got you an you got me. This conveys in the estimate that George truly cared for Lennie and has no vicious intent when he is to shoot Lennie. By shooting Lennie, George gave him a kind-hearted and peaceful death with no intend malicion.The murder of Lennie is justified as Steinbeck shows the audience through the novella, realistic themes that were evident in the 1930s. Steinbecks writing style has been depict as a naturalist or realist type. It is cle ar from the start, that in Of Mice and Men in that location is a predatory nature in human existence. Candy says to George, I shouldnt tolerate let no freaky shoot my dog. Having said that, it foreshadows Lennies death and what George must do. It also conveys in the predilection that Lennie willing face a connatural fate to Candys out of date dog who is weak and handicapped. Society does not tolerate the weak as at that place were limited resources during the spaciousDepression. As seen in the scene where Slim dr give births the lowest pups, it is clear that Steinbeck is attempt to send across the message that save the strongest lived during the Great Depression. John Steinbeck gave the reader a realistic view on what would invite happened during a difficult time and Lennies death is similar to what would have occurred during the 1930s.The closing reason that justifies Lennies death, is when one ponders the humanity of the men attaining the cattle ranch. As evident i n the novella, Lennie has no problem killing small animals and even people. If the reader is to imagine Lennie on a ranch with a extended group of animals, especially rabbits no subject how many times Candy deliberate the numbers, there would be no likely way for the men to make a profit off the rabbits given the centre Lennie would kill due to his brute strength. By forgetting the reality of the situation, the men forget that the ranch was not even a reachable goal in the first place. As indicated by George, I think I knowed from the very first. I think I knowed wed never do her. This supports the idea that there was unfeignedly no hap of the men actually getting the ranch. By killing Lennie, George puts an end to the unrealistic breathing in in which Lennie would have created problems in qualification the dream farm profitable.Georges actions are justified through realism that the end scene portrays. When George shoots Lennie, he ensures he dies a peaceful death. If Geo rge did not kill Lennie, Lennie would have faced a possible torturous death. His actions are also justified as George meant no malicious intent and only wants the best for his friend. Lennie would have made smell difficult even on their own land. Steinbeck shows the realism that people in the Great Depression would have faced in situations similar to Lennie and Georges he shows us a piece of history and the tragedies attached. Although one may condemn Georges shooting of Lennie, mercy killing was the best choice for both of the men.Loved the point rough the Depression times. (Paragraph 3) and also the unrealistic dream point in the next paragraphYou could also discuss the fact that George also loses something by killingLennie. He really believed their relationship was special. ( George tells Slim this). Killing Lennie wasnt just the easy way out for George.Once again, an original approach.I am sure your exam essay will reflect your mature approach and your unwaveringly work.